In the same way that slavery was a moral challenge for the 19th c. & totalitarianism was a challenge for the 20th c., the challenge that women & girls face around the world is the moral challenge of our time.

~ Sheryl WuDunn & Nicholas Kristof


Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Submit to Serve by Chris Seiple

Chris Seiple, Ph.D., is president of the Institute for Global Engagement (IGE), a research, education, and diplomatic institution that builds sustainable religious freedom worldwide through local partnerships. IGE's newest initiative, Women of Faith for Peace & Security (WFPS) exists to enable women of faith to play a more signficant role in sustainable peace and security.

It is well-understood in development circles that community transformation cannot begin until the girl-child has been educated to at least a fifth-grade level of literacy and understanding. In other words, change only occurs when a mother has the education to understand and seek a better life for her kids.[i] (Obviously, men are also capable of such conclusions, but they are historically less likely to come to let alone implement them.) More unfortunate, it is also a well-established fact that religion has played, and continues to play, a role in preventing women from becoming educated, while, worse, encouraging inequality and a sense of inferiority.
Two imperatives result.
  1. The development community needs to more fully examine the interrelationship between and among gender, development, religion, and religious freedom. Fortunately, some ground-breaking scholarship is now taking place, led by such women as Katherine Marshall (e.g., see her recent article in the tenth anniversary issue of The Review of Faith & International Affairs, "Religious Freedom in U.S. International Development Assistance and Humanitarian Relief: Ideas, Practice, and Issues," as well her 2010 article in the same journal, "Development, Religion, and Women's Roles in Contemporary Societies."
  2. It is incumbent upon all religious adherents, especially those of global religions and impact, to think through clearly what their faith teaches about gender relations, and what that "looks like" in practice: from marriage and the family to the workplace to policies that one's government pursues. While various positions have been and will be articulated, it is more imperative still that such conversations take place in a manner that edifies and encourages both genders, within the faith, among faiths, and between faiths and the world we live in.
What follows below are some reflections on the second imperative, from three, interrelated, perspectives. First, I write as a married Christian man with two sons and two daughters (all under the age of seven), each of whom I pray will experience a model of mutual submission between man and woman. I also write as someone who works for religious freedom worldwide because of his faith—that is, as someone who tries to love his neighbor better each day, in part by working for my neighbor's opportunity to freely choose what s/he does (not) believe, and therefore how s/he behaves.

Foremost, however, I write as someone who understands the relationship between belief and behavior not as a moral discussion unique to a particular culture from a specific time. Instead I write as someone who understands the relationship between his belief and behavior as an opportunity to testify to the timeless message of Christ across time, a chance to bear witness to the new reality of the Kingdom of God through the mutual submission He requires of every relationship, every discussion, no matter the issue at hand.

In other words, I seek to share some thoughts amidst life's journey to better understand the majesty, mystery, and mercy of Christ. I welcome your response, and rebuke.

To read the rest of this article, click here.

2 comments:

  1. Thanks Chris for connecting the dots on so many levels: your own masculinity, marriage, reilgious gender norms, development, social change, religious freedom... As I read this, my mind is enlarged thinking about simple yet higher things we all hold dear (Liberty, Justice, Peace, Equality for All) and how when one is compromised (i.e. freedom, women's human agency) the others are devalued and compromised (i.e. "separate but equal" was not really equality but rather a hierarchy of worth/value)... I have to admit that I haven't read the whole article yet but I look forward to it & hope others do too!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks Chris for connecting the dots on so many levels: your own masculinity, marriage, reilgious gender norms, development, social change, religious freedom... As I read this, my mind is enlarged thinking about simple yet higher things we all hold dear (Liberty, Justice, Peace, Equality for All) and how when one is compromised (i.e. freedom, women's human agency) the others are devalued and compromised (i.e. "separate but equal" was not really equality but rather a hierarchy of worth/value)... I have to admit that I haven't read the whole article yet but I look forward to it & hope others do too!

    ReplyDelete